Tuesday, 11 February 2014

BCP Commentary 1 - Repentance at daily prayers




I love the [1662] Book of Common Prayer (BCP).  When I was at university our college Principle, Richard Turnbull, used to tell us that the two most important books in the world were the Bible and the BCP - that we should always carry one of each around with us.  At the time I was not even an ordinand, though I was hoping to be; I found this BCP adoration absurd.  What is so good about a book that is hundreds of years old?  A book which is at times hard to understand?  A book which is almost never used in the Church of England today?  What is so good about the BCP?  

Just 

about 

everything.  

Since getting ordained as a Deacon in the Church of England in 2012 my views on the matter changed dramatically.  During my ordination I took oaths that I would agree with and uphold Anglican doctrine - which the canons tell us are seen primarily in Scripture, the historic creeds, and these as understood by... the Book of Common Prayer, the Ordinal, and the 39 Articles (now all included in the little book we called the BCP).  My first year in parish ministry was a whirlwind of deep theological reflection brought about by the oaths I took that day - did I really hold to the theology of the 39 Articles?  Did I think the  doctrine of the BCP was not only correct for the 16th  century but actually the true interpretation of the Scriptures?  

As someone who years before came within half an inch of joining the Eastern Orthodox Church and who throughout his time at university regularly attended Pusey House, it is fair to say that I have become a changed man.  This change is not just in how I think and what I believe, but in what I do and how I perceive what should be done in church.

I could not agree more with the words of Jonathan Fletcher, once Rector of St. Ebbes Church in Oxford when he said   

"I was introduced to the Book of Common Prayer and the 39 Articles, and I was convinced that the theology of the Church of England was the best presentation of the Protestant Reformation"

If that isn't enough to get your juices flowing with passion to go and read the BCP then let me bring out the big guns - TIMOTHY KELLER.   Tim Keller is a GIANT of modern day evangelicalism.  His ministry has defined a generation in New York City and his preaching, his teaching, his pastoring has reached countless thousands.  If you have not read any of his books then open up amazon and go buy them all right now

...............( If you are too lazy to go to amazon yourself here is a link for you: http://www.amazon.co.uk/s/ref=ntt_athr_dp_sr_1?_encoding=UTF8&field-author=Timothy%20Keller&search-alias=books-uk&sort=relevancerank )

In an interview on sermon preparation Keller was asked what material he used in his own private devotional time to help him continue growing spiritually.  This was his answer:


"I use a version of M'Cheyne's reading calendar, reading the Bible in its entirety every year.  I follow the traditional daily office, and I read and pray all the psalms every month.  I use older versions of the Book of Common Prayer for many of my prayers."
Timothy Keller in Sermon Preparation ed. Craig Brian Larson (Hendrickson, Peabody, 2012)

By 'older versions' Keller almost certainly means the 1662 and this shows his rejection of the more modern versions fobbed off as the BCP by The Episcopal Church.

If the BCP is used even by giants like Tim Keller in their private devotion times, when they have access to a wealth of Presbyterian resources from their own tradition, then it is something every evangelical should take the time to look at.

In this post, and in many more following, I intend to walk you through some of the most important doctrines and beliefs we find in the BCP - I want to get behind the rustic archaic language and really get down to the marrow and the bones of the book.  The BCP has changed my life and my relationship with God, I hope it will for you to.



"The BCP starts in the perfect place for a book concerning 

how to pray and live the Christian life - with Biblical repentance 

and the teachings of grace alone through faith alone in Christ 

alone."



Start with the Bible


So let's begin with the confessional start to the BCP services for Morning and Evening Prayer.  Cranmer ditched the numerous offices called the 'hours' which were used by monks and wanted to bring right doctrine and right belief back into the churches of England in a language they could understand.  He did it like a PRO.

The services start off in the best places possible - with Scripture, lots and lots and lots of Scripture.  When beginning the service there are eleven different scriptures one can read from to set the tone.  All of these are on the theme of repentance and God's forgiveness.  They make clear just how serious sin is "Enter not into judgement with thy servant, O Lord; for in thy sight shall no man living be justified" (Psalm 143.2) but also the overwhelming power of God's mercy "Rend your heart, and not your garments, and turn unto the Lord your God: for he is gracious and merciful, slow to anger, and of great kindness, and repenteth him of the evil." (Joel 2.13)


The Exhortation


Following these Scriptures comes the first exhortation - here the minister sets the scene for the entire service and lays out vital Biblical truths.

"Dearly beloved brethren, the Scripture moveth us, in sundry places, to acknowledge and confess our manifold sins and wickedness; and that we should not dissemble nor cloak them before the face of Almighty God our heavenly Father; but confess them with an humble, lowly, penitent, and obedient heart; to the end that we may obtain forgiveness of the same, by his infinite goodness and mercy. And although we ought, at all times, humbly to acknowledge our sins before God; yet ought we chiefly so to do, when we assemble and meet together to render thanks for the great benefits that we have received at his hands, to set forth his most worthy praise, to hear his most holy Word, and to ask those things which are requisite and necessary, as well for the body as the soul. Wherefore I pray and beseech you, as many as are here present, to accompany me with a pure heart, and humble voice, unto the throne of the heavenly grace, saying after me;"

What can we learn from this?

1) As a church we are brothers and sisters in Christ, we are one body, we admonish one another in love.  This service can be taken by an ordained minister or a lay person and in either case they address the people simply as beloved brethren - as brothers and sisters whom we love and who God loves.  

2) Scripture compels us to confess our sins and wickedness.  Not only are we sinners but we are 'manifold' sinners, that is we sin ALOT in various ways.  Not only are we sinners but we are wicked as well.  The word 'wicked' seems harsh, to our nice 21st century minds it seems unfair - Hitler was 'wicked' the lady who put a cat in a bin and walked away was 'wicked' but are we good upstanding people 'wicked'?  Yes.  We are all sinners and this makes us all wicked - no amount of window dressing can get around that fact.  

3) We by nature try to hide our sins.  We are masters at hiding our sins, at cloaking them so people cannot see them, we disguise them and paint them as good things or virtues.  This is pride and arrogance.  How foolish it is to try and justify our sins before an Almighty God who sees right through every lie we tell and who knows our own hearts and reasons for sinning better than we do ourselves!

"Not only are we sinners but we are 'manifold' sinners, that is we sin ALOT in various ways."

4) Instead of pride we need humility, we need to be humble, we need to be lowly, we need to be people with hearts that are contrite, hearts that long for obedience, hearts that yearn for forgiveness.  If we want to be forgiven of our sins we need to really desire for them to be forgiven.  Being penitent doesn't just mean feeling sorry but means actively rejecting our old sins and turning away from them and consciously marching toward Christ and holiness.

5) Sometimes our sins are so great and we have committed them so many times that we find it impossible to believe that God would ever forgive us - again.  But we are assured in this exhortation that genuine repentance always leads to forgiveness because God's goodness and mercy are infinite - His love and His mercy never end, they go on forever and ever and ever and beyond.  No matter how deep down our sins are in our souls the arm of the Lord is not too short to save.

6) We should confess our sins with humility at all times and in all places.  Martin Luther when he nailed his 95 Theses to the door of the church in Wittenberg had this  as his first point:

"Our Lord and Master Jesus Christ, when He said 'Repent', willed that the whole life of believers should be repentance."

Luther started the Reformation, he changed the world, by starting with repentance.  Luther was right, Cranmer knew it, and we must own it.  We are sinners, we sin all the time; just imagine if every thought you had was permanently tattooed on your face - you would lose all your friends in no time!  We are all so full of pride and arrogance and idolatry, we worship everything that gives us pleasure.  As John Calvin said "The human heart is a factory for making idols."  He was spot on.  We should be constantly bringing our sins to the foot of the Cross.  The holiest people are not those who find they repent less and less but those who find themselves repenting more and more as the Holy Spirit reveals to them all the different sins they commit every hour of every day.  The difference is these holy people immediately show humble obedience to the call of the Spirit and lay down their sin at the foot of the Cross, they hand it over to Jesus knowing that they cannot deal with it themselves.

7) Not only should we confess in private to God - all the time - but we should do so publicly in church.  As James 5.15 makes  clear:

"Therefore, confess your sins to one another and pray for one another, so that you may be healed."

Public confession makes us face up to the seriousness of our sin, helps us to see that we are not alone in our warfare against sin, the flesh, and the Devil.  It encourages us through a mutual commitment to turn away from sin and a direct call of our sins forgiven under Christ.

"No matter how deep down our sins are in our souls the arm of the Lord is not too short to save."

8)  What is church about?  Why do we meet on a Sunday?  The BCP says we meet together to "render thanks for the great benefits we have received at his hands, to set forth his most worthy praise, to hear his most holy word, and to ask those things which are requisite and necessary as well for the body as the soul."  To our modern ears and sensibilities it is striking how the word 'worship' is missing.  Praise and worship are not the same thing - I can praise Simon Ponsonby for being a fantastic preacher but that doesn't mean I worship him.  I can praise God for His goodness in healing me of sickness but that is different from saying I worship Him - though I should hope I would do that too if He did!  Today, especially in the more charismatic evangelical circles, of which I am a part, it is often seen that the worship music is the most important part of the service.  It is not.  Worship is important, we should sing psalms, hymns, and spiritual song, but it is not the main reason we gather.  

We gather to thank God for all He has generously given us, to praise Him because of who He is - the only one worthy of praise.  We gather to listen to the Bible and hear it explained, and to ask for things.  These days it is often seen as a faux-pas to say that prayer is 'asking for things' but actually most Biblical prayer is exactly that.  When looking at the whole of Scripture and at this text in the BCP it is true to say that the main, but not only reason, we meet together is to edify one another, to build up one another, to have fellowship, and to share in the wonders of the faith together.  Just look at Paul's treatment of what should be going on in services in 1 Corinthians 12-14 - the word edify or something similar crops up countless times.  Church is not about YOU it is about God and His body on earth - the Church.

9) We pray for what we need, for what is needed not for what is unnecessary.  We pray not just for what our bodies need but for what our souls need.  There is no point looking after your soul if your body withers in the process, there is no point looking after your body if you don't let the Great Physician heal your soul.

10) When we confess and bring our sins before the throne of the heavenly grace we need a pure heart and a humble voice.  God hears the humble but ignores the proud.



The Confession



Having made clear why we are here and what we must do to get right with God the people say this meaty confession:

"Almighty and most merciful Father; We have erred, and strayed from thy ways like lost sheep. We have followed too much the devices and desires of our own hearts. We have offended against thy holy laws. We have left undone those things which we ought to have done; And we have done those things which we ought not to have done; And there is no health in us. But thou, O Lord, have mercy upon us, miserable offenders. Spare thou them, O God, who confess their faults. Restore thou them that are penitent; According to thy promises declared unto mankind in Christ Jesu our Lord. And grant, O most merciful Father, for his sake; That we may hereafter live a godly, righteous, and sober life, To the glory of thy holy Name. Amen."

I love this confession, it models Biblical confession like no other.

1) The God we confess to is ALL powerful and is more merciful than anyone else. He is also our loving Father, a Father who will always rejoice when His children return back to Him from their sinful ways.

2) Let us just put it straight out there, no beating around the bush, we have got it wrong, we are in error, we have willingly walked away from our Good Shepherd and got lost in the darkness and thorny bushes of the Evil One.  

3) Why have we got so lost?  What caused our sin?  No time here for shifting blame like in the Garden - we are the reason, end of story.  We have sinned and abandoned God because we just love the desires of our sinful human hearts too much and believe all its lies about it being OK.  There is no room for self justification of any kind in Biblical repentance.

"When the BCP says that there is no health in us it means that we are completely and utterly DEAD in our sins, we are game over"

4)  How have we sinned?  How do we know what sin is?  Well God's Holy Laws reveal to us His heart, His standards, His ways and we ignore them and break them like criminals who just can't resist committing crime.  We sin firstly, and most of the time, not by the things we actively go and do but by the things we fail to do, all the things we really should have done if we truly loved God but don't.  These are called sins of omission.  But we also actively do what is wrong, these are sins of co-mission.  Together this makes clear that sin is not just 'stuff' but actually where the 'stuff' comes from - we are sinners by nature.

5) Between all of our omission and co-mission we are so full of sin that there "is no health in us"  I love this phrase.  It cuts right to the heart of the matter.  Imagine you are playing a computer game, your character has 'health' usually represented by a bar of some kind.  Every time you get hit or do something wrong you lose a bar of health.  When you have no health left you are dead - game over.  When the BCP says that there is no health in us it means that we are completely and utterly DEAD in our sins, we are game over, no coming back without a miracle from a healer (Colossians 2.13) That healer is called Jesus.

6)  Given our status as 'dead meat walking' we are rightly asking God to show mercy and pity on us.  If we are coming to Him with a right and humble heart we will be miserable about our sin.  If your sin does not make you miserable then you are not really repenting.

7)  Mercy is not something someone deserves - if it were it would be a right.  We have no rights before God, He would be 100% just if He just damned us all to Hell for our sins.  There is no legal argument we could make, no loop-hole to get us out of jail for free.  The only hope we have is the mercy of the judge.

8) Thankfully God has made countless promises in the Scriptures to forgive all those who come to Him with genuine repentance and faith.  In confession we beg God to restore us back to full health and spare us from our much deserved sentence in Hell because of the promises He has made to us.

9)  Just confessing the past is not enough, true repentance means changing your future as well. Thus we end with a plea that God would allow us and help us to live a righteous life that is godly from now on.  We can't even dream of doing this by our own abilities and feeble strength - but we can if we ask God to change us from the inside out, new heart, new Spirit, new desires.

10) Why would God do all of this?  To bring glory to His mighty Name.  Everything we do should be to the glory of God and thus we end our confession by lifting it all up, especially His mercy, as a sign of His mighty greatness and infinite glory.


Absolution

Cranmer ditched the old 'I absolve' you formula the Roman Catholic Priests used to say  except for in the most serious circumstances - but more on that in a later post.  He preferred to let the Scriptures do the talking instead.  He didn't want people to be reliant on a minister to feel forgiven, he wanted them to know that reality in their daily walk and every day life - that they could confess to Jesus on their own and know and feel His forgiveness.  Along these lines this is the Prayer Book absolution in Morning and Evening Prayer:

"Almighty God, the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who desireth not the death of a sinner, but rather that he may turn from his wickedness, and live; and hath given power, and commandment, to his Ministers, to declare and pronounce to his people, being penitent, the Absolution and Remission of their sins : He pardoneth and absolveth all them that truly repent, and unfeignedly believe his holy Gospel. Wherefore let us beseech him to grant us true repentance, and his Holy Spirit, that those things may please him, which we do at this present; and that the rest of our life hereafter may be pure, and holy; so that at the last we may come to his eternal joy; through Jesus Christ our Lord."

1)  God has no problem with sending people to Hell, He is just and holy and doing so is completely in-keeping with His character.  But He does not desire it, God would rather people turned from their wickness and live.  We cannot blame our sins on God, it is our hard hearts that are to blame.

2)  God has given His ministers (notice the word 'priest' is not used here) the power to tell people, and told them to tell people, that their sins are forgiven.  Does this mean a minister can absolve people and just tell them they are forgiven?  No.  

3) Whilst the minister is commanded to drive home to the repentant that God forgives their sin, they cannot actually forgive it - only God can forgive sins (hence one reason why Jesus must have been God).  To be forgiven we actually need to be penitent, to desire forgiveness and desire to change our ways.  We must actually repent.

"Repentance doesn't mean squat unless the person who is truly repenting also 'unfeignedly believes his holy Gospel'"

4)  But simple repentance is not enough.  Muslims repent to Allah, Hindus repent, even some atheists repent of their wrongdoing and wish to change the direction of their lives.  But none of these people are actually forgiven.  The reason why is that repentance doesn't mean squat unless the person who is truly repenting also 'unfeignedly believes his holy Gospel'  Unfeignedly believing the holy Gospel means totally, sincerely, without pretence or hidden motives, completely believing that Jesus Christ is Lord, God, and Saviour and died on the Cross to forgive us our sins.  Without real faith nothing is worthwhile, especially repentance.  Without real faith repentance would be like if the prodigal son was running home to his father but ended up going to hug a Roman Soldier and getting beaten up instead.

5) So we need to truly repent and really believe the Gospel.  The problem is that by nature that is just not what we do.  We don't naturally repent of our sins - naturally we relish in them and love them and want to be bathed in them till we drown.  If we want to truly repent and be forgiven we are going to have to have someone from outside change our hearts and give us that true repentance.  That person is God the Holy Spirit.

6)  In this prayer we pray that the Holy Spirit would enter into our lives and make us truly repent of our past sins and realise our unworthiness.  We also pray that the Holy Spirit would change us from the inside out, that He would give us new desires, new ways of seeing the world that match up to how God does, new hopes, new dreams, new strengths, new gifts.  We pray that the Holy Spirit would change our motives so that all we do would be to the glory of God and thus be pleasing to Him.  Anything we do which might seem 'good' in the eyes of the world is not 'good' in God's eyes unless it is done to glorify Him - in His eyes it is like a filthy used tampon (Isaiah 64.6) or a sticky steaming pile of dog turd (Philippians 3.8).  Trying to please God and gain His favour by doing 'good things' and being a 'good girl/boy' is like walking up to God with a big box wrapped up as a gift, giving it to Him, and Him finding inside the things I just mentioned.  This is why other religions can't lead to heaven.  This is the teaching of the 39 Articles of Religion:
"WORKS done before the grace of Christ, and the Inspiration of his Spirit, are not pleasant to God, forasmuch as they spring not of faith in Jesus Christ, neither do they make men meet to receive grace, or (as the School-authors say) deserve grace of congruity: yea rather, for that they are not done as God hath willed and commanded them to be done, we doubt not but they have the nature of sin." Article 13



Don't treat the Almighty God like a great divine Santa in the sky

-  He isn't.


7)   The prayer ends by asking that we may, with this new heart and new desires, finally come to the eternal Kingdom, finally when we die make it to heaven.  How do we get to heaven?  "Through Jesus Christ our Lord"  The only way to the Father is through faith in the Son (John 14.6) and forgiveness at His cross and a redemption price paid in His blood.


So then...


So far we have only mined the deep riches of the opening prayers before the real services of Morning and Evening Prayer actually start - and look at how full of gems and gold these three passages were!  The BCP starts in the best place possible for a book concerning how to pray and live the Christian life - with Biblical repentance and the teachings of grace alone through faith alone in Christ alone.


I hope you will continue to read more posts from this series on the BCP!







Friday, 24 January 2014

Well's Cathedral, blasphemy, heresy, and Canon Law




A few days ago I discovered this article from Christian Concern:


http://www.christianconcern.com/our-concerns/social/wells-cathedral-promotes-blasphemous-film-about-jesus


It raises awareness of the fact that the Chapter of Well's Cathedral have decided to allow, as part of the Bath 2014 Film Festival, a showing of Martin Scorsese's 1988 film "The Last Temptation of Christ" - a film which when released led to protests, legal battles, and even a theatre being burnt down by an indignant crowd of fundamentalist Christians!    

But why has this film been denounced as 'blasphemous' 'heretical' 'dangerous' and 'subversive'?  What, if anything, is wrong with showing such a film in a Cathedral?   The answer has to be simply everything.







Blasphemous and Heretical? Really?

Firstly, let us look at the accusations that the film is blasphemous and heretical.  


At the start of the film there is a message from Martin Scorsese, a man who describes himself as a 'lapsed Catholic' but whose 4 divorces would at the least put a question mark over his commitment to being anything vaguely Catholic, let alone a Biblical Christian.  In this message he states that what follows is not based on the Christian Gospels but on the book of the same name by Cretan author Nikos Kazantzakis.  It is worth pointing out that the book is based on Nikos' readings of the Gospel's yet falls short of claiming to be history.  Nowhere does this film claim, as Dan Brown did his Da Vinci Code, to be fact. Yet the overlap of themes between the two - Jesus' marriage to Mary Magdalene, not dying on the cross etc. - leads to the film being even more misunderstood today.  Those who read and lapped up the fiction and historical errors of the Da Vinci Code as based on 'fact' are likely to transfer this position to the Last Temptation - or at least see in it some form of vindication.  I was at 6th form college when the Da Vinci Code was released and it amazed me how many people, my age and older, simply read the story as largely factual in regards to its claims about Jesus and Christian history.



The biggest issue in the movie is that it portrays Jesus as a sinner.  In one scene Jesus claims that He will pay for His sins by dying.  In another He asks Mary Magdalene to forgive Him because he has done "too many bad things."  Whilst at the monastery He even lists His sins.  He also picks up two stones to represent His own sins in the film's adaptation of the stoning of the adulterous woman (John 8.1-11).  




"The biggest issue in the movie is that it portrays Jesus as a sinner."



Furthermore, we actually see Jesus sinning during the most offensive scene of the movie.  In this scene Jesus is seen consummating His marriage with Mary Magdalene.  It takes place during what is often called the 'dream sequence' or 'vision sequence' - the vivid temptation Jesus on the cross lives out where He, instead of dying as our propitiation, leaves the Cross and lives a 'normal life.'  To most Christians viewing images of our Lord and Saviour, the very Pure Lamb of God having sex is beyond the pale, but in the context of the movie it actually makes Jesus a sinner.  How?  It all comes down to what Jesus reveals in His Sermon on the Mount.   Matthew 5.27-29  reads:





“You have heard that it was said, Do not commit adultery. But I tell you, everyone who looks at a woman to lust for her has already committed adultery with her in his heart. If your right eye causes you to sin, gouge it out and throw it away. For it is better that you lose one of the parts of your body than for your whole body to be thrown into hell."

This passage shows just how totally depraved we are compared to God's perfect standard of holiness.  To picture and imagine in one's mind having sex with a person who is not actually your wife (even if you are imagining they are!) is adultery, is sin, and is a serious breach of God's Holy standard. The penalty for this crime is death and damnation in hell, it is worth remembering the reality of this - as Pastor Mark Driscoll would say "Hell is hot, forever is a long time."  (Praise the Lord that if we truly repent and whole heartedly believe the Gospel we will be saved from this most just sentence!)



In this dream sequence Jesus commits adultery, He commits sin.  This is a cataclysmic problem for all of humanity.  Scripture reveals to us that the only reason we can be saved is because Jesus did not commit sin.  Jesus had to be sinless to be the acceptable sacrifice.   Scripture repeatable affirms these truths:




"Who among you can convict me of sin?" John 8.46a (hint: they couldn't)

"You know that He was revealed so that He might take away sins, and there is no sin in Him."  1 John 3.5

"For you know that you were redeemed from your empty ways of life inherited from the fathers, not with perishable things like silver or gold, but with the precious blood of Christ, like that of a lamb without defect or blemish"  1 Peter 1.18-19

"For we do not have a high priest who is unable to sympathise with our weaknesses, but One who has been tested in every way as we are, yet without sin."  Hebrews 4.15



The doctrine of the sinlessness of Christ is enshrined in the 39 Articles of the Church of England - the churches official doctrine (see canon A5)



"Christ in the truth of our nature was made like unto us in all things, sin only except, from which he was clearly void, both in his flesh and in his spirit.  He became the lamb without spot who, by sacrifice of himself once made, should take away the sins of the world, and sin, as Saint John saith, was not in him..."  
- Article 15


The Bible teaches than when we put our faith in Jesus as Lord, God, and Saviour, He takes all of our sin, shame, filth, and darkness onto Himself and gives to us His perfect record, His dazzling white robe of Righteous, and a relationship with the Father only such sinlessness can bring.   This is seen in 2 Corinthians 5.21



"He made the One who did not know sin to be sin for us, so that we might become the righteousness of God in Him."


If Jesus sinned, He could not give us these things as He didn't have them.  As Article 11 states:



"We are accounted righteous before God, only for the merit of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ by faith."




To say or show that Jesus was a sinner is blasphemy and heresy.  It is contrary to Scripture and the Historical Formularies of the Church of England.


"In this dream sequence Jesus 

commits adultery, He commits sin. 

 This is a cataclysmic problem for all

 of humanity."


The film also contains many other issues, included but not limited to the concept that Jesus could stop being the Son of God as if this were a position or role and not an integral part of His eternal being, Paul being portrayed as the person who 'invented' Christianity, and the innumerable simple historical errors! 

All of this places the film most certainly in the 'heresy' and 'blasphemy' category.  Whether portraying such things was Scorsese's intention is irrelevant.  







The film defended?


Many people try to defend the film claiming that it portrays the very real humanity of Christ and helps us relate to Him as Brother and not just Lord.  It is also argued that the temptation scene is merely showing what can be gleaned from Hebrews 4.15 and the passages describing His temptations in the desert.  Jesus was tempted, of that there can be no doubt. 


It is a good claim, it seems a strong defence, but does this excuse the film or does it just skirt the issue entirely leaving the charge of Heresy still valid? 





"Jesus was tempted, of that there 



can be no doubt."



Firstly, as already pointed out, the film doesn't only show temptation but actual sin. 


Secondly, it can be questioned if Jesus being tempted in this way at the portrayed time happened - we know He wrestled with His destiny so violently in the Garden of Gethsemane that He became so stressed that He sweated blood.  But it was in the Garden that He finally said "Your will be done."  On the cross He was lucid, He asked God to forgive the people their sin, He forgave the thief, cared for His mother, and quoted a Psalm that tells us that He was abandoned, due to the sin He took on, by the Father - yet quoting this Psalm is important as everyone there would have known that it continues to glorify and praise God for delivering Him! 

Thirdly, we often equate temptation only with lustful and base things.  But temptation is much wider than this, it includes the temptation to take your power and gifts and use them for evil - much as He was tempted to do in the desert.  It is also worth noting that the temptation portrayed in the film is a giving in to the temptation to think of such things - ask any mature Christian who is living victoriously and they will tell you that when temptation begins to stir, before you allow yourself to even begin to follow its thoughts and whispers, you can dismiss it through prayer.  Was Christ ever tempted to think lustful thoughts or imagine sinful things? I would say yes - but He never allowed it to even get so far as His imagination. 

The temptation portrayed in the film is an unbiblical temptation that contradicts the very pure word of God.  







So why is the film being shown?


"Not hiding from controversy 

doesn't

 mean openly screening blasphemy

 on our home turf"



In the prepared response given when one (quite rightly) writes to the Dean of Well's Cathedral the Very Revd John Clarke (see the Christian Concern article linked above for details on how - I would also advise you to write to the Archbishops) he gives the justification for showing this blasphemy in the Cathedral:


" Much has changed in public perceptions of faith over the last 25 years. In this more sceptical age the church should not hide from controversy and part of the task of the cathedral is to promote an intelligent faith that is capable of attracting men and women to follow in the way of Jesus in the twenty first century.
With this in mind we are organising a discussion before the screening which will look at the theology behind the book and film and which will also consider what is not said by the film. On the evening, in my welcome and introduction, I will also suggest that the film offers, inevitably, a partial view of who Jesus was. It is not designed to be a biography. My hope therefore is that an audience who do not normally think about Jesus will spend time thinking about his significance for us today.
Equally, on the day after the screening I will be giving a talk on ‘Jesus’ as part of a series in the cathedral called ‘What can we believe today?’. This will provide another chance to invite people to deepen their questioning about faith, both for those who wish to think about faith and theology afresh, and for those who are in the process of exploring their approach to God."


What are we to make of this?  A few thoughts:

-      "Not hiding from controversy" doesn't mean openly screening blasphemy on our home turf

-      What is "intelligent" about a faith that contradicts its foundations in Scripture?

-      Is screening heresy really, ever,  an effective way to "attract men and women to follow in the way of Jesus."  How is this really any different from having a public or dramatised reading from the Qu'ran about Isa (the false Jesus in that book) as a way to attract people to the real Christ?

-      Will many people even turn up to the discussion, and even if they do, given the above, is it still a useful way to evangelise?

-      What is "not said" by the film is not really the problem - the problem is what "is said" by the film!

-      "Suggesting that the film offers, inevitably, a partial view of who Jesus was."  To me this sounds like wet liberalism and compromising the essentials of the faith - the Last Temptation does not offer a 'partial view of who Jesus was' it offers lies, heresy, and blasphemy in the place of God's divinely revealed truth.  A minister should not "suggest" it is partial he should boldy denounce it as simply wrong.

-      Are many really going to go to the following evening session? And even if they do, is the very pure, uncompromising, exclusive doctrine of Scripture going to be put forward here?  Given all of the above I have my concerns it won't be (to put it mildly).


"The Last temptation does not offer

 a 'partial view of who Jesus was' it 

offers lies, heresy, and blasphemy

 in the place of God's divinely 

revealed truth."



Is the showing legal?






I hope that from the above you can see clearly that the film is heresy and blasphemy, full of lies and half-truths (more like quarter-truths - if I am generous).  I also hope you can see the issues with the Cathedral's position and their clear compromise with modern liberalism.  The question is, are the Cathedral clergy allowed to show the film?  There are two things to consider - their oaths of ordination and Canon Law.


During their ordinations to the priesthood the clergy of the Cathedral were asked this clear and simple question by the bishop:



"Will you be ready, with all faithful diligence, to banish and drive away all erroneous and strange doctrines contrary to God's Word; and to use both publick and private monitions and exhortations, as well to the sick as to the whole, within your cures, as need shall require, and occasion shall be given?"

The clergy answered "I will, the Lord being my helper."
How is publicly screening blasphemy and heresy banishing and driving away all erroneous and strange doctrine?  How does showing material that blatantly contradicts Gods word possibly fulfil this oath?  Were one to hold a Bible Study within the church, which was attended by the faithful, and in it read some of the works of the heretics like Pelagius or Arius - with the sole and only intention being to strongly denounce and refute it - this could be understood.  To use church property simply to publicly screen such dangerous heresy with little to no knowledge of if any will respond to attempts to refute it, cannot be seen as sensible.  Showing this film in such a way to the public is a clear breach of the ordination oath.


More importantly, and less personally, there is Canon F 16.1 of the Church of England.  This reads as follows:



"When any church or chapel is to be used for a play, concert, or exhibition of films or pictures, the minister shall take care that the words, music, images, and pictures are such as befit the House of God, are consonant with sound doctrine, and make for the edifying of the people."
(It is ridiculous to claim that this canon would not apply to Cathedrals, Minsters, Abbey's etc. - they are all "Houses of God.")


Let me put this bluntly:

-      the blasphemy and heresies of The Last Temptation with its scenes of Jesus Christ having sex do not "befit the House of God" in any way or measure.

-      The film is in direct and clear opposition to "sound doctrine" as understood by the Church of England, namely the clear teaching of Scripture and the Historic Formularies.

-      The heresies of this film can in no way be understood to truly "edify" the people.



The screening of this blatantly blasphemous and heretical offensive film in Wells Cathedral is clearly illegal under Canon Law and should probably be seen as a breach of the ordination oaths of the clergy of that place who assented to it being shown.



 "How is publicly screening 

blasphemy and heresy 'banishing 

and driving away all erroneous and 

strange doctrine?'"


Popular Posts